To properly evaluate the possibility of non-loneliness

I'm considerating the possibility that perhaps I'm under a severe hallucination: Nothing isn't quite right.
I mean "Nothing is quite right." See? There's something wrong. This unkown power is forcing me to use double negative and twisting my mind!!

It seems that many people are blaming me with pretty much everything. Or is it because I am actually majorly flawed?

One more thing, than I'll explode. Or burst out. Or lose control. Or cry. Oh, forgot, I've cried already.
Seriously, I can't take it anymore.

I want to be left alone. Literally alone. When you are one, free from the existence of other individuals, you don't have the binary concept of loneliness/non-loneliness. Just like the paired negativity and possitivity, when this kind of binary relation doesn't exist, you don't get the counterpart reaction whenever you strike another. Thus when you're literally left alone, you don't get alone, since there's no such a counterpart existence of grouped, socialised, or so called "not alone". You are NEUTRAL.
Yet this sence of literal isolation can never be achieved. At least not in the living world, which indicates that the possibility of being free from loneliness is actually zero, since no one can ever be really isolated.
The conclusion is, one cannot get away from loneliness because no one is ever really alone. To conquer loneliness, you have to be the only human being in this world, i.e. the achievement of absolute isolation.

Does anyone even know what I mean?